Oil Gas

Look at this Absolute Unit: Oklahoma Courts Tackle Cross-Unit Commencement Issues

Posted by Stephanie Moser Goins on August 25, 2020

Introduction

Until recently, Oklahoma courts have not addressed the issue of whether a multiunit horizontal well that is commenced off-unit can perpetuate a lease on the adjacent unit into its secondary term, if the lateral for the well fails to penetrate the unit in which the leased premises was located until after the primary term of the lease has expired.

McGirt Implications for the Oklahoma Oil and Gas Industry

Posted by Stephanie Moser Goins on July 15, 2020

Don’t Panic: The Implications of McGirt v. Oklahoma for the Oil and Gas Industry in Oklahoma

by Stephanie Moser Goins[1]

A Matter of Time: Notice, Marketability, and Affidavits of Heirship

Posted by Ball Morse Lowe on February 21, 2020

Mineral estates in Oklahoma are generally subject to the same collection of laws governing real property as surface estates. For example, 84 O.S. § 213 governs the descent and distribution of property of estates located within the State of Oklahoma, including mineral interests. Laws governing real property and succession typically go hand-in-hand and are ideally yoked to accomplish one thing: marketable title. 

Oklahoma Race-Notice Considerations:  Can an Affidavit or 'Notice' of an Oil and Gas Lease Provide Constructive Notice?

Posted by Ball Morse Lowe on February 10, 2020

Under Oklahoma’s Statute of Frauds at 15 O.S. §136, certain types of contracts, including contracts involving conveyances of real property or modifications thereof, require that the terms of the transaction be memorialized in writing and signed by the party to be charged, or the party against whom specific performance is sought. Cloud v. Winn, 303 P.2d 305, 308 (Okla. 1956). Because a lease of mineral interests is a conveyance of real property, an oil and gas lease must be in writing. Further, an instrument affecting rights in real estate must be filed in accordance with the recording requirements of Title 16 of the Oklahoma statutes to be valid as against third persons. See Amarex Inc. v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 1987 OK 48 ¶ 14, 772 P. 2d 905, 908.

Chesapeake Exploration, LLC v. Buell (Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4551)

Posted by Zachary T. Ball on April 15, 2019

In Chesapeake Exploration, LLC v. Buell (Slip Opinion No. 2015-Ohio-4551) (Chesapeake), the Ohio Supreme Court addressed two certified questions from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5796)

Posted by Zachary T. Ball on April 15, 2019

In Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5796), the Supreme Court of Ohio issued a landmark decision involving the Dormant Mineral Act. In Corban, the Supreme Court of Ohio addressed two certified questions from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.